GMSignPainter wrote:Redim wrote:GMSignPainter wrote:It's useless to -% since we added the TT cap. TT cap after lvl 100 is your main lvl + 20.
So if you're lvl 123, your max TT is 143.
what if im 150?
max tt 170?
Not, 200 for 150
Rooftrellen wrote:Hold up.. You guys really added a TT cap feature? You mean for leeching only? God I hope so or you just royal screwed pk. And I do mean ROYALLY. If you need clarifaction as to how I'd gladly help.
and also gives something else to do once ur lvl 150 
its a great idea and ALOT of people like itRooftrellen wrote:There's only ONE way that it would not screw up pk, and here it is, the only way this would not completely screw pk is if it was retardedly easy to get to lvl 150. And.. here's something you all probably haven't thought about. Have you ever tried going to vd2 with.. 130 magery? 140 magery? It's terrible, you kill soo slow. Have you ever gone to vd3 with 150 magery? It's terrible again, you kill SOO slow. Get the picture here? For this to be effective not only are mobs going to need to be nerfed but exp is also going to have to be increased quite substantionally so basically just make the game easier, like it wasn't easy enough to begin with. You guys will see sooner or later that this is one of the worst changes you could make to DR, the leveling and TT system should not have been altered in any way. Bottom line is that anything you do to alter the basic leveling system of DR is going to have an impact on the PK system in one way or another, that's just how the game is designed.
And.. you talk about it giving you something else to do when you get 150.. you do realize that nobody ever gets 150 right? Also, low lvls were not overpowered, the pk system has very little to do with your actual level, it's your TT level and your DUAL CLASS level that determines your ability to kill someone and also yours and the other persons rares. EX: Lvl 105 D1 archer with 125 TTs (under new system w/ g20 Force) CAN'T kill Lvl 105 D1 priest (w/ G20 AC) VS. Lvl 105 D1 archer with 180 TTs (w/ g20 Force) CAN kill Lvl 105 D1 priest (w/ G20 AC). See what I did there? The actual character level is completely meaningless. Now again EX: Lvl 120 D3 Archer with 140 TTs (under new system w/ G20 Force) CAN'T kill Lvl 105 D1 priest (w/ G20 AC). Once again, the character level is completely out of the equation but also, with the new changes the DC rank is also out of the equation simply because the TTs are so low and the D2/3 bow that the archer is using by this time still isn't giving him enough damage to kill the priest. This change makes higher DC ranks meaningless. Sure the priest couldn't kill the archer either but whats point in being D3 if you can't kill a single D1 priest? This change effectively makes priests (or warriors.. or anyone with high AC.. hell a mage could make AC rares and be unkillable for quite some time under this system) more overpowered. A character with high AC is not going to see any real threat from anyone until people are well into the 160 TT region, meaning lvl 140+.
That's the actual kind of thought you have to put into making decisions like these. Not just "Oh it sounds good and the people seem to like it so it must be good". And I hope you learned a little something about PK from this.
Rooftrellen wrote:That scale is still going to end up being the same as the one they've decided on, only a slight difference of about 30 tt levels. Still does not support a reasonable argument against my examples. They need to rethink this entire thing.
Just to make sure I understood the pattern: (2*your lvl) - 100 = Max TT
101-105; 110 tt
106-110; 120 tt
111-115; 130 tt
116-120; 140 tt
121-125; 150 tt (At this point it starts to become mildly better)
126-130; 160 tt
131-135; 170 tt
136-140; 180 tt
141-145; 190 tt
146-150; 200 tt
This is a better scale I will give you that. But even using this table, the priest in my example still would not be in any really danger until well into the lvl 130 region.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
