Do you think this is fair?

[mrlobak]

dawn of sorrow guild not all favourisvm, i like sythe act but other, no. go corrupt more jill.

[Eleval]

dawn of sorrow guild not all favourisvm, i like sythe act but other, no. go corrupt more jill.

I still don't see where there is favouritism and corruption Oo

[sush]

So you hold a christmas event. Events in game and in real life are usually supposed to be the same for everyone, no matter the status they have in a certain community. So you say to one player, even tho he is the first to register, that he won't be able to get a desired item, no matter what. No favouritism? Then explain me what the hell is it?

And to make things even worse you clearly give a go ahead to another player to abuse the event by letting him/her log with 3 chars and ask for whatever he/she wants and probably he/she got them aswell. Refer to screenshots posted by knolly, page 3 and LP-s post at page 4 of event rules(cba to quote them).

No corruption? No favouritism? Seriously? Are you really that fuc.king dumb or just try to make up some shit excuse for yet another gm screw up?
Just because you might be a good specialist, a programmer, doesn't mean you are fit to be a leader. I have seen more proffesionalism in MU or Helbreath private servers ran by 14 year old kids.

[Olon]

dawn of sorrow guild not all favourisvm, i like sythe act but other, no. go corrupt more jill.

I still don't see where there is favouritism and corruption Oo

You can see it, you just think people are dumb enough to be fooled if you protect yourself with the same shitty line EVERY single time, you are a retard and everyone knows it.

[Eleval]

So you hold a christmas event. Events in game and in real life are usually supposed to be the same for everyone, no matter the status they have in a certain community. So you say to one player, even tho he is the first to register, that he won't be able to get a desired item, no matter what. No favouritism? Then explain me what the hell is it?

And to make things even worse you clearly give a go ahead to another player to abuse the event by letting him/her log with 3 chars and ask for whatever he/she wants and probably he/she got them aswell. Refer to screenshots posted by knolly, page 3 and LP-s post at page 4 of event rules(cba to quote them).

No corruption? No favouritism? Seriously? Are you really that fuc.king dumb or just try to make up some shit excuse for yet another gm screw up?
Just because you might be a good specialist, a programmer, doesn't mean you are fit to be a leader. I have seen more proffesionalism in MU or Helbreath private servers ran by 14 year old kids.

So, what you say is that should let Vys have 3-4 D4 from the Event, Zypern 2 and Yllse 0? So, making the server unbalanced strenght-wise? I didn't do that on my own, I talked with my team before and they all agreed.

[sush]

No I'm saying what you did IS corruption and favouritism. Giving an advantage to one player while letting the other player be in disadvantage. I don't care what this does to server, it is still corruption and you cannot do something like if you want to run a respected server. We all know what happened to previous servers.

[Eleval]

dawn of sorrow guild not all favourisvm, i like sythe act but other, no. go corrupt more jill.

I still don't see where there is favouritism and corruption Oo

You can see it, you just think people are dumb enough to be fooled if you protect yourself with the same shitty line EVERY single time, you are a retard and everyone knows it.

I can at least see that you are dumb enough to still be fooled by Ali.

[Olon]

Fooled with what lol? What is this, yet another attempt to make this all go away? How about we gather enough peoples "signatures" who are not pleased with how you run this server with all the corruption and let someoen else run it? Would you atleast have enough courage to take it like a man and resign once you saw the results? And please, stop asking for proof, almost every topic here has been with proof, you just do the usual: "Yea I talked to the team(meaning you told them how it's gonna be) to make this rule up that is not written down anywhere because my little guild gets beat in wars and quests"
Within made an effort to get to the spot he was in, it is not fair to take it away like that.

[Eleval]

Fooled with what lol? What is this, yet another attempt to make this all go away? How about we gather enough peoples "signatures" who are not pleased with how you run this server with all the corruption and let someoen else run it? Would you atleast have enough courage to take it like a man and resign once you saw the results? And please, stop asking for proof, almost every topic here has been with proof, you just do the usual: "Yea I talked to the team(meaning you told them how it's gonna be) to make this rule up that is not written down anywhere because my little guild gets beat in wars and quests"
Within made an effort to get to the spot he was in, it is not fair to take it away like that.

I don't run this server, I only code, GMSpherix runs it.

[Olon]

Fooled with what lol? What is this, yet another attempt to make this all go away? How about we gather enough peoples "signatures" who are not pleased with how you run this server with all the corruption and let someoen else run it? Would you atleast have enough courage to take it like a man and resign once you saw the results? And please, stop asking for proof, almost every topic here has been with proof, you just do the usual: "Yea I talked to the team(meaning you told them how it's gonna be) to make this rule up that is not written down anywhere because my little guild gets beat in wars and quests"
Within made an effort to get to the spot he was in, it is not fair to take it away like that.

I don't run this server, I only code, GMSpherix runs it.

Okay, well I actually meant you not acting as a GM, stick to coding and playing, you can't be a GM if you have an ingame char, been proven millions of times.
And are you not the head-GM? GM's run the server, not someone who pays for the server's upkeep.