GMSignBreaker wrote:We'll investigate his claims, although I don't put much faith into accusations put forth by someone who just got banned. Nonetheless if there is a cause for concern for corruption then we won't hesitate to look into the matter. And of course the accused GM will not take part in the investigation.
GMNyx wrote:investigation team has been set up with 2 GM's that will be looking into the matter
LadyPhoenix wrote:GMNyx wrote:investigation team has been set up with 2 GM's that will be looking into the matter
I have no stakes in who wins this "argument" so I would just like to ask a general question. Who are the 2 GMs looking into the matter? As far as I know and have been told from numerous sources, only 2 GMs have access to the server's logs. Those 2 GMs would be you and SignPainter. Since this involves SignPainter's character, he isn't part of this investigation. So I'm assuming you're one of the GMs checking into this. If the second GM doesn't have access to the database, then technically it would only be one GM looking for the source of the matter. I'm not saying you're corrupt or will skew the results, but it's quite easy for someone to overlook something small that could be vital.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
