Changing PK system in other nation territories.

[täisdibla]

The current PK system in other maps of the enemy nations except the main town is just imbalanced!

People should get NK for pking in ANY other nation territories because it makes sense, you buy the permit to go there on a business trip or just a tour or to chat with the enemy, not to PK their low levels ( Abusing the permit should have punishment ).

So here is what I suggest with an example:
Let's say a Vyseus player buys a permit and goes to Sedless and PKs someone in 1 hit. He will receive 20 Yllse NK and will be slowed down accordingly and lose exp/items upon death and he will also receive 5 Vyseus NK for abusing the permit, disturbing the peace and wrecking trade relations between nations who aren't currently in War Status ( they are all the time actually but the actual war goes on in Nation War, not in lvling maps of other nations )
This punishment works in any map of the opposing nation's territory but not in neutral maps and this will avoid abuse of the permit.
To avoid having the visitor's being abused by the natives, they will also receive NK in the following way: If a Vyseus is in Barantan, the current system remains, nothing is changed, but if for example I go PK a Vyseus in Sedless who has no Yllse NK, I gain 20 Vyseus NK ( the other nation will respond by tagging you as a criminal ) and 5/10 Yllse NK ( discuss on this amount please ) ( because your nation doesn't want you abusing visitors, disturbing the peace and wrecking trade relations )

With my system I think it would be very balanced as the Visitors couldn't abuse and they couldn't get abused either.

edit: I saw that I failed horribly with poll options so I had to edit them
edit2: I had another idea:
Ghost Ressurection cannot be used on the enemy nation, only Authority of Whole Save can be used.
This would prevent people creating level 1 priests to ress themselves in the enemy nation and it would prevent abuse.

[SquirelTime]

i dont think that you should get war from klilling players in other nation. at the end of the day the different nations are supposed to be at war. people already choose to pt with other nations in nuetral maps if they wish too, which is fine. i dont think we should try to discourage pking between warring nations though.

maybe adding nk to players who kill players who are a certain lvl gap lower than them, say 20 or 30 lvls, to stop people slaying noobs. how ever this could be abused by low lvl priests just hangin around rezing people though.

[Dark_Assassin]

theres already a topic made for this

[WishingStar]

is there an no option?

[kain220]

is there an no option?

Biased poll +1 for no option

[täisdibla]

is there an no option?

I don't see the point in adding it, yes/no votes are quite useless, I just put them on some of my suggestions for the fun of it.
If you don't make a proper post explaining why you dislike my idea, no one serious will give a shit about your "no". This poll is not biased, if you don't like my idea, just don't vote.

Anyway I just thought of another idea:
Ghost Ressurection cannot be used on the enemy nation, only Authority of Whole Save can be used.
This would prevent people creating level 1 priests to ress themselves in the enemy nation and it would prevent abuse.

[WishingStar]

is there an no option?

I don't see the point in adding it, yes/no votes are quite useless, I just put them on some of my suggestions for the fun of it.
If you don't make a proper post explaining why you dislike my idea, no one serious will give a shit about your "no". This poll is not biased, if you don't like my idea, just don't vote.

Anyway I just thought of another idea:
Ghost Ressurection cannot be used on the enemy nation, only Authority of Whole Save can be used.
This would prevent people creating level 1 priests to ress themselves in the enemy nation and it would prevent abuse.

stop trying to change Dr the way it is.

[täisdibla]

is there an no option?

I don't see the point in adding it, yes/no votes are quite useless, I just put them on some of my suggestions for the fun of it.
If you don't make a proper post explaining why you dislike my idea, no one serious will give a shit about your "no". This poll is not biased, if you don't like my idea, just don't vote.

Anyway I just thought of another idea:
Ghost Ressurection cannot be used on the enemy nation, only Authority of Whole Save can be used.
This would prevent people creating level 1 priests to ress themselves in the enemy nation and it would prevent abuse.

stop trying to change Dr the way it is.

The suggestions forum exists for good ideas of change that GMs might like/get inspired by.
Just leave this subforum and never come back, it's not the place for you.

[Tensu]

I don't see the point in adding it, yes/no votes are quite useless, I just put them on some of my suggestions for the fun of it.
If you don't make a proper post explaining why you dislike my idea, no one serious will give a shit about your "no". This poll is not biased, if you don't like my idea, just don't vote.

Anyway I just thought of another idea:
Ghost Ressurection cannot be used on the enemy nation, only Authority of Whole Save can be used.
This would prevent people creating level 1 priests to ress themselves in the enemy nation and it would prevent abuse.

stop trying to change Dr the way it is.

The suggestions forum exists for good ideas of change that GMs might like/get inspired by.
Just leave this subforum and never come back, it's not the place for you.

but u just like to post ideas and dont want any ppl replying to it or even give their own opinion... suggestions are here for everyone, not just for ureself

[täisdibla]

but u just like to post ideas and dont want any ppl replying to it or even give their own opinion... suggestions are here for everyone, not just for ureself

I just don't want simple a simple "no", that gives me nothing to work with.
If you point out what you don't like I can improve my idea based on that or just defend my idea with a counter-argument.
I know they are here for everyone, but do you seriously think "stop trying to change DR the way it is" is a proper way to reply? I don't think so.