ArabianArrow wrote:._.
Why are you using the word "punished" for those who want to stay level 105 and max TT? I think it's an unnecessary word, over-exaggerated imo.
GMs want people to experience the game more, same way GM wants people to experience jobs better. Plenty of people wanted the old job system (which has been in place for YEARS), are they being punished? If you think needing to adapt is being punished, then so be it.
This is Dragon Raja 1.6 after all, don't expect old methods to stay in play.

The comparison is so horrible that I don't even know if I should merit it a response. The jobbing system overhaul had a goal to achieve, and that was to stop people from depending on macros. And if your memory serves you correctly, I was one of the first ones who really brought that up in the previous server's forums and that's when it gained traction. I'm not equating adapting to punishment, after all, I wouldn't say having better pits besides vd1 and DB is punishment. If you have trouble reading what I'm saying (which you are because you made that stupid comparison) then please ask for clarification or don't spout nonsense. And don't agree with nonsense just because someone agrees with you, Atlantis. It makes you look desperate, clinging onto such a pathetic attempt at making comparisons.
Players will experience the game more now that upper level pits are much better for tactics, is there a need to punish (yes I'm using that word again, until you can prove it's an unnecessary, over-exaggerated word) those who really want to stay lower? And I'm going to say this again: If it ain't broken, don't fix it. If it's fixed already, don't try to fix it more. Jobbing system was beyond broken, it was pathetic. Line leveling was beyond broken, it was encouraging players to AFK level. Staying at 105 to gain tactics is not broken nor is it necessarily undesirable. The only problem was that players had no choice but to stay at 100-105 if they wanted to gain good tactics. Now that's changed with better pits at higher levels so leave it at that.
If you guys want to argue this out, please bring Elmy in. He can actually produce good arguments without making the mistakes you guys are making (which is to read a small portion you disagree with and attack it with all you got with one-liners, disregarding all the other details, and a host of others). I'm sick of having to explain and explain and explain the same shit over and over until you people understand the main point. I'm fine with people disagreeing with me after understanding what I'm saying, but people who have no clue what the hell they're talking about and disagreeing with me makes me do a face palm.