wow. I think I just lost a brain cell >_< Took me 10 tries to understand you.
There's a big difference between adding a variation of what already exists and totally just taking an aspect of somethign and making it x10.
LadyPhoenix wrote:wow. I think I just lost a brain cell >_< Took me 10 tries to understand you.
There's a big difference between adding a variation of what already exists and totally just taking an aspect of somethign and making it x10.
LadyPhoenix wrote:example...
you: make the wizard hit 2x on stone so it's more fair
me: make a ice spell that hit same as fire spell but is ice damage
What you say is you want 2x what wiz have now. I say wiz and chose to do 1 or other. not do 2x.
grofire wrote:LadyPhoenix wrote:example...
you: make the wizard hit 2x on stone so it's more fair
me: make a ice spell that hit same as fire spell but is ice damage
What you say is you want 2x what wiz have now. I say wiz and chose to do 1 or other. not do 2x.
first of all arcer hit on stone 5k and sometimes higher wiz do 200 that sound fair !!
i bet i know what u want to do, take the d1 or d2 spell and make it the same as fw, but do u want it to be the same dmg too ? if yes then OMG u just talking rubish
grofire wrote:LadyPhoenix wrote:example...
you: make the wizard hit 2x on stone so it's more fair
me: make a ice spell that hit same as fire spell but is ice damage
What you say is you want 2x what wiz have now. I say wiz and chose to do 1 or other. not do 2x.
first of all arcer hit on stone 5k and sometimes higher wiz do 200 that sound fair !!
i bet i know what u want to do, take the d1 or d2 spell and make it the same as fw, but do u want it to be the same dmg too ? if yes then OMG u just talking rubish
Gaz wrote:grofire wrote:LadyPhoenix wrote:example...
you: make the wizard hit 2x on stone so it's more fair
me: make a ice spell that hit same as fire spell but is ice damage
What you say is you want 2x what wiz have now. I say wiz and chose to do 1 or other. not do 2x.
first of all arcer hit on stone 5k and sometimes higher wiz do 200 that sound fair !!
i bet i know what u want to do, take the d1 or d2 spell and make it the same as fw, but do u want it to be the same dmg too ? if yes then OMG u just talking rubish
I dont think wizard is meant to hit hard on stone , but protect the archer , thief , warrior who do hit the stone , by supporting them with spells , e.g pro , z , light , and stunning or killing the attackers? why do you wanna make the wizard the best class ever? btw grofire i never play with u before but u really r a damn noob
grofire wrote:i do not know who ur but i know ur stupid, u never played with me but u say i noob, a fool talk, i guessed i do not need to be suprised ur only a ZT never smarter then a roten appel ( and i do not mean red appel)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests