Whirling

[Hinder]

They do work on the stones.

[masterYU]

can use multi as pk skill.

[ADVERIC=]

multi for stones and pvp, db ex more easy than thiefs, they can piercing the ss and his arrows of ice can focus in 1 point better than thiefs

[Olon]

It is true actually, I have tested myself, double ex on archer is much easier. Don't know why tho.

[ArabianArrow]

@ Hinder: Thieves do 4 hits on stone, archers do 5. Difference is one 1, so archers win SO FAR. But when you take distant rares into consideration, theives do more damage. That damage makes up for the 1 hit.

@ masterYU: Honestly, how many archers do you see using multi in highrate? Or even lowrate past D1? Yah, very VERY little. Every wonder why : o ?

@ ADVERIC: Already explained how the multi works on stones (@ hinder). Double X being easier isn't the same for everyone. Personally, thief's X is easier for me. Maybe because I know something other people don't : <. Point is, archer's X isn't generally easier than a thief's. That's just YOU. Piercing priests hiding in SS is great. That one is definitely a +. How is archer focusing on 1 point better? If archer can have same blast pattern as thief I'd take it any day.

[masterYU]

@ Hinder: Thieves do 4 hits on stone, archers do 5. Difference is one 1, so archers win SO FAR. But when you take distant rares into consideration, theives do more damage. That damage makes up for the 1 hit.

@ masterYU: Honestly, how many archers do you see using multi in highrate? Or even lowrate past D1? Yah, very VERY little. Every wonder why : o ?

@ ADVERIC: Already explained how the multi works on stones (@ hinder). Double X being easier isn't the same for everyone. Personally, thief's X is easier for me. Maybe because I know something other people don't : <. Point is, archer's X isn't generally easier than a thief's. That's just YOU. Piercing priests hiding in SS is great. That one is definitely a +. How is archer focusing on 1 point better? If archer can have same blast pattern as thief I'd take it any day.

ya but still, till d1 u gonna roll in wars and pvp...

[ArabianArrow]

@ Hinder: Thieves do 4 hits on stone, archers do 5. Difference is one 1, so archers win SO FAR. But when you take distant rares into consideration, theives do more damage. That damage makes up for the 1 hit.

@ masterYU: Honestly, how many archers do you see using multi in highrate? Or even lowrate past D1? Yah, very VERY little. Every wonder why : o ?

@ ADVERIC: Already explained how the multi works on stones (@ hinder). Double X being easier isn't the same for everyone. Personally, thief's X is easier for me. Maybe because I know something other people don't : <. Point is, archer's X isn't generally easier than a thief's. That's just YOU. Piercing priests hiding in SS is great. That one is definitely a +. How is archer focusing on 1 point better? If archer can have same blast pattern as thief I'd take it any day.

ya but still, till d1 u gonna roll in wars and pvp...

True.

Time spent after D1 greatly exceeds time spent before D1. That's true too.

[Hinder]

@ Arab, I was just pointing out a pro of archer. They still have their cons

[Dark_Assassin]

in fact they probably have the worse cons of all the classes, compared to their pros

[balzak]

i know they have shit deffence but i will aways prefer archers then thiefs... but it is just me