Logout timer

[Feralize]

...
or just create some maps that are non-pk, where newbs could train up to 70-90 etc.

Oh yeah, lets just get a milion bucks worth of icecream as well. Might sound easy, but it aint

[Feralize]

what if a lvl 90 (cant be PKed) come to annoy lvl 92?

indeed, it keeps being abusable

Plus a high level char could just continue to kill the monsters the low levels are fighting as well, which also is annoying like hell

[Olon]

Life ain't fair, come back another day or just move to another place if you get PK'd. Or if you did or said something that is getting you constantly PKd then you deserv it.

[ArabianArrow]

What if PK is disabled in nation maps. So a Yllse can't PK a Yllse in Sedless, but a Zyp or Vys can. But then people will just endlessly ks other parties, which leads to a past suggestion of losing fame when PKing someone of the same nation. When your fame reaches 'X' you can't PK anyone from your nation till it's raised again.

[balzak]

the only cap in pk system i think is fair enough is if you make a lvl cap for pk like you can only attack players that has at least X lvls less then you or if the players attack you

i dunno how hard it would be but at least this way only players that are close from you lvl can attack you but if someone come to annoy you and attack you you just attack him back and if you want to fight for a pit to lvl up you should be able since players would be at same lvl or almost same lvls

making restrictions like everyone here is suggesting i just think will be bad for the pk system and make you powerless against annoying ppl and make a lot of options for ppl to abuse..

[Tensu]

the only cap in pk system i think is fair enough is if you make a lvl cap for pk like you can only attack players that has at least X lvls less then you or if the players attack you

i dunno how hard it would be but at least this way only players that are close from you lvl can attack you but if someone come to annoy you and attack you you just attack him back and if you want to fight for a pit to lvl up you should be able since players would be at same lvl or almost same lvls

making restrictions like everyone here is suggesting i just think will be bad for the pk system and make you powerless against annoying ppl and make a lot of options for ppl to abuse..

a lower lvl char f*** up ur party by killing it or killing ur mobs is just as annoying as getting pked

[balzak]

a low lvl char would die by the mobs and if he attacks high lvl char then by what i suggested you should be able to attack back and kill him... the only catch is how much lower a char should be for this rule to be applied this i dont know how much would be good enough

edit: mabe if he is 10 lvl less then you you shouldnt be able to attack him? or something proportional of the lvls he is? or after lvl 80-90 there is no more restriction? really dunno...

[grofire]

the only cap in pk system i think is fair enough is if you make a lvl cap for pk like you can only attack players that has at least X lvls less then you or if the players attack you

i dunno how hard it would be but at least this way only players that are close from you lvl can attack you but if someone come to annoy you and attack you you just attack him back and if you want to fight for a pit to lvl up you should be able since players would be at same lvl or almost same lvls

making restrictions like everyone here is suggesting i just think will be bad for the pk system and make you powerless against annoying ppl and make a lot of options for ppl to abuse..

10000000+ !!!!!!!!!

ur totly right, but good luck trying to explain it to espda.....

[Mjollu]

actually i dig your idea..
lets say 5 lvls of difference up to lvl 50
10 lvls of difference up to lvl 100
20 lvls of difference or no restrictions at 100+

simply because there arent so many high lvl people to pk, making the no restriction after lvl 100 a reasonable choice

[balzak]

i think something like that should work better then making a rule of no pk at all...