LadyPhoenix wrote:but then no one would dual priest/wiz bcause you can cast spells already.
well as I know, no one duels priest and wiz in this present day. only priest and wiz theirselfs.
LadyPhoenix wrote:Also dualing your own class wouldn't be as beneficial because you can already learn all the spells/skills for your class.
ofcuz it wouldn't be as beneficial.. dualing the same glass is more like an upgrade.
it's like your a bread and you dual bread.. you're still a bread.. but if you dual peanut butter.
your a peanut butter sandwich.
Tensu wrote:dual class system seems more then fine to me already... "what isnt broken doesnt need fixing"
btw, about the dual system, it's goes like this :
stats :
dualing warrior gives u a lot of STR and CON wich are the main stats for a warrior
dualing archer gives u a lot of dex and some movp wich again are main stats for archer
dualing thief gives u a lot of Movp and some dex wich (yes again) are the main stats for thief
same for wiz (INT and WS) and Priest (WIS and PS)
but also ur dual symbole is bound a lot towards the dual u choose (it's dependant of the first class u dual) :
dualing warrior, warriors are natural tankers therefor all warrior duals get the AC bonus
dualing archer gives (atleast for thief and archers) the extra force wich are normal cuz archer are supposed to be the physical dmg dealers
dualing priest would give u the extra priest abilities in ur symbole wich is resist for most of the classes (wise and natural vigor for priest dualing priest)
same for alll the other symbols, it's more class related then it seems at first sight
well I think I'm expecting too much on an old classic game.
at least my gaming experience on dual class does not work like this.
maybe this is how DR works, well then I think I could stay in the flow.