LadyPhoenix wrote:And I gave you an argument as to why the way you construct it is not a good method. I've had players back me up yet you stay on your high chair and claim that you're way is the right way.
This aren't being done anymore by the GMs. you have admitted this yourself.
When did I say things
aren't being done? Things are being done, even if it's not right in your face. The only person making a big deal out of this is you, I don't see anyone else complaining as badly as you are. Why? Because it's not a big deal. You're making a mountain out of an anthole. I have already addressed your argument, it was you who simply decided not to address each points that I have addressed. And like I said, keep giving us more examples to "argue" that how we are doing is wrong. I can give you a hundred "examples" to nitpick every single rule that I have written myself. I have no reason to stay on this supposed high chair to say you're wrong and I'm right. This is our policy and it won't be changed just because one player is making a huge deal out of it. We aren't going to change this and that's that. Nothing you say will change our policy. The only thing that will change our policy is if there are problems we need to address that requires us to list all the little bugs. As I have constantly told you, please distinguish between unknown bugs, future bugs, large bugs, small bugs, and known bugs. The bug abuse section was designed to cover future, unknown, and large bugs. Small and known bugs (the ones you are concerned about) are not a big deal and can be dealt with on an individual basis.