LadyPhoenix wrote:There is no way to prove or disprove the words of a GM. Even if the GM is incorrect, the GM ("team") can just make a new rule to counter the problem. Evidence can be dismissed and not shown to the public in order to make the player seem incorrect. Even on previous servers, when everyone knew that there was corruption, GMs found some way to explain the abnormalities. The only way corruption was proved was by showing proof from the logs which was done from within the GM team.
You really can't argue against the ones who make the rules and hope to win if they don't want you to win.
GMSB: You are the classic private game server GM that relies on his own judgement rather than using standard protocol and procedures.
I brought together strange bedfellows
And please provide me an example on this case where I didn't follow proper protocol and procedures. I laid out all the reasons why I couldn't solve Arab's issue in a timely manner. I don't have the energy to explain it to you again. If it's about how I respond to Arab, then I'll concede I'm not following proper procedures. I'm not afraid to admit to things I am wrong about. But the case that was brought up was handled properly, at least in my opinion. If Arab wishes, he can send a PM or ticket to the entire team of the circumstances and lay out the reason why he thinks it's been handled wrongly. I'll stay out of that conversation only to the extent to which they need me to explain my actions. But even you would agree I couldn't give out warnings with only one report and no exchange of words with the person at question.
also every action has a counter reaction people cry corruption for what reason? wheres the self gain? maken people quit simply means no more pk for poor zt 