about pking rules GM could u please read

[WishingStar]

once enemie , its isn't easy for them to become peace please understand both ZT and CN doesn't give up or even talk about peace? every day they pking each other this only increase their anger.i dont think each of them will bow down their head and said "im sorry"?
and GM shouldn't cared about this,because it is their personal issues. and this is what make DR fun? if people want to be carebear they can go play hello kitty online which is available in the mmorpg site?
DR is made to pk and harrasing is not good excuse to stop them from pking and enjoying their moment.

If GM didn't interfere then one guild can kill DR's population by 50% just by PKing everyone. I think the rule should only be excluded for guilds vs. guilds. But then again... people can just leave the guild that was at war, level in peace, then rejoin it and attack the guild again.

there is 2 nation out there not only vys!
and plus GM can release the free chance to change nation so people in vys can move to increase other nation population. majority of people are in vys which leaves other nation empty and those low lv players which can not find any help? in order to do this, it can help other nation to grow population when they log in they see players and not an empty nation?

[eduardoconrado]

PPl here are amazing sometimes, many ppl here know the rules, dont be lazy to mask your instinct of joking boys, Dragon Raja is an old game, and in most case guys already play it...CN, Brazil, Hk, Argentina etc...

So, We Know that we cannot block passage or make long time childish of massive killing that turn impossible a guy to follow a patch to some area for play the game...etc...

The good felllows know too that we cant make a personal hunt that make a nb fellow stop play...

Plx GM, i saw a guy that made a topic with traduction of rules in Chinese..so if someone burn out a pig...you ll know the unmasked bullshit...

[Karvinen]

The harassment rule excludes situations where it is a war situation. However if one party of the pk war decides to accept defeat, it may be different. In events like pk wars, the harassment policy will protect the side that has the humility to say "we lose the war, please stop killing us" but are still being hunted down wherever they go.

Hi,

I was wondering if you could elaborate on this rule. The guild Zero Tolerance has been PKing my guild since the beginning of the server. We have never pked them back (except in situations where we're defending ourselves because they came to pk us first). We do not openly PK their members. We have asked them to stop many times. They have refused and continue to PK us. It is not the entirely of ZT that is PKing us. It's mainly the character Torment. He has pked my guild members everywhere from Orc village to west desert to man made dungeon. I was wondering if this would fall under the harassment clause. I'm seriously sick of him making it unable for us to play. A level 100 pking level 25-80 characters isn't even pking in "good spirit" because there is almost no possible way for my guild to have a fair fight with him or his guild. It's obvious that this is done only for harassment.


-LadyPhoenix

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[ArabianArrow]

The harassment rule excludes situations where it is a war situation. However if one party of the pk war decides to accept defeat, it may be different. In events like pk wars, the harassment policy will protect the side that has the humility to say "we lose the war, please stop killing us" but are still being hunted down wherever they go.

Hi,

I was wondering if you could elaborate on this rule. The guild Zero Tolerance has been PKing my guild since the beginning of the server. We have never pked them back (except in situations where we're defending ourselves because they came to pk us first). We do not openly PK their members. We have asked them to stop many times. They have refused and continue to PK us. It is not the entirely of ZT that is PKing us. It's mainly the character Torment. He has pked my guild members everywhere from Orc village to west desert to man made dungeon. I was wondering if this would fall under the harassment clause. I'm seriously sick of him making it unable for us to play. A level 100 pking level 25-80 characters isn't even pking in "good spirit" because there is almost no possible way for my guild to have a fair fight with him or his guild. It's obvious that this is done only for harassment.


-LadyPhoenix

• Mass PK: Mass PK includes repeatedly killing people regardless of who they are, in the same location, over and over again. The GM Team will punish the Mass PKer if several cases are reported by different people. This refers to leveling locations and paths to leveling locations (must be the only path) ONLY.

- "regardless of who they are" doesn't apply to your situation.

- "in the same location, over and over again" doesn't apply to your situation.

Not to mention, you've got plenty of other places to level at.

He's 'Torment' for a reason.

PS: Perhaps now's a good time to go Zypern.

[WishingStar]

The harassment rule excludes situations where it is a war situation. However if one party of the pk war decides to accept defeat, it may be different. In events like pk wars, the harassment policy will protect the side that has the humility to say "we lose the war, please stop killing us" but are still being hunted down wherever they go.

Hi,

I was wondering if you could elaborate on this rule. The guild Zero Tolerance has been PKing my guild since the beginning of the server. We have never pked them back (except in situations where we're defending ourselves because they came to pk us first). We do not openly PK their members. We have asked them to stop many times. They have refused and continue to PK us. It is not the entirely of ZT that is PKing us. It's mainly the character Torment. He has pked my guild members everywhere from Orc village to west desert to man made dungeon. I was wondering if this would fall under the harassment clause. I'm seriously sick of him making it unable for us to play. A level 100 pking level 25-80 characters isn't even pking in "good spirit" because there is almost no possible way for my guild to have a fair fight with him or his guild. It's obvious that this is done only for harassment.


-LadyPhoenix

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

ur brave pking a lv 52 warrior at man made?

[Karvinen]

ur brave for being a lvl 52 warrior in man made? go back to rhinos or manscorps

[Carmichael]

ur brave for being a lvl 52 warrior in man made? go back to rhinos or manscorps

I always see low lvls trying get leechers in mmd. why? get more exps killing stuff near lvl you're at.

[eduardoconrado]

I think this is the Last Chance of DR....if only one or two guilds playing in Vyseus and... dont party and help other ones...and pkling without reason with a regular dumb hunt ll ruin the game...

The survivabillity of this server depends on us.

I think Dr is good cause pkling is a good choice of play.....but what i said is not about this...this server is growing and we need to colaborate with it....

No one need to say hello, or give me friendship, but you can try...its not counter strike...

[春哥原地复活]

The harassment rule excludes situations where it is a war situation. However if one party of the pk war decides to accept defeat, it may be different. In events like pk wars, the harassment policy will protect the side that has the humility to say "we lose the war, please stop killing us" but are still being hunted down wherever they go.

i don't agree with this.. have u ever think about the situation that the lose side commit to be defeat this time with saying "we lose the war, please stop killing us",and pk the other side next time when they are fully prepared?

[GMTempest]

The harassment rule excludes situations where it is a war situation. However if one party of the pk war decides to accept defeat, it may be different. In events like pk wars, the harassment policy will protect the side that has the humility to say "we lose the war, please stop killing us" but are still being hunted down wherever they go.

i don't agree with this.. have u ever think about the situation that the lose side commit to be defeat this time with saying "we lose the war, please stop killing us",and pk the other side next time when they are fully prepared?

Then they haven't truly "ended" the war and have tried to abuse the rules, in this case they themselves will be subject to punishment and have become undeserving of protection. Otherwise if a sufficient amount of time has passed, then they have just started a new war. The revision of the new rules will include situations like this.