Enchant Hammer Anomalities

[Ampz]

Hi dear Staff, the enchant hammer system should be reviewed.

I post my results here:

Enchants
Try Item Succes Rare Grade
1 Defense Cape FAIL
2 Defense Cape FAIL
3 Defense Cape FAIL
4 Defense Cape FAIL
5 Defense Cape SUCCESS Vertigly 2
6 Defense Cape FAIL
7 Defense Cape FAIL
8 Defense Cape FAIL
9 Defense Cape FAIL
10 Defense Cape FAIL
11 Defense Cape FAIL
12 Defense Cape FAIL
13 Defense Cape FAIL
14 Defense Cape FAIL
15 Defense Cape FAIL
16 Defense Cape FAIL
17 Defense Cape FAIL
18 Defense Cape FAIL
19 Defense Cape FAIL
20 Defense Cape FAIL
21 Defense Cape FAIL
22 Defense Cape FAIL
23 Defense Cape FAIL

Success Rate: 4.3 %

We should take note, this was done on the Beta server as part of a test. we enchanted more of 14 high value items on normal server, included 7 ac capes, and another 7 gemboxes with only succes on 2 of them (14% succes rate).

After several tryes , we got some successful enchants on beta, with the new atribute called "g2 NULL" wich show's something is bad there.



after 200 hammers used, i only could get effect like nature stay, vertigly and priest damage. Useless ones, nothing valuable there.

[SimpleStupid]

I tried about 200-300 as well, success rate is about 20-25%.
The rares are just random stuff, i got G1/2 desire, force, dist, snag, nature, etc, and many other red rares.
Its pure luck.

[Ampz]

I tried about 200-300 as well, success rate is about 20-25%.
The rares are just random stuff, i got G1/2 desire, force, dist, snag, nature, etc, and many other red rares.
Its pure luck.

The luck no exist on a virtual enviroment, all it's about randomization.

So, in that randomization a rare called "null" it's getting exposed. Dont try to spam this bugg report post. thx u.

[SimpleStupid]

Success Rate: 4.3 %

after 200 hammers used, i only could get effect like nature stay, vertigly and priest damage. Useless ones, nothing valuable there.

I was just saying my test result is different than yours, "nothing valuable there" is bad luck maybe?

[PowerRangers]

i used 50-60 hammers. 15-20 worked. so rate is good.

[Ampz]

bump

[SjokzArmpit]

i used 50-60 hammers. 15-20 worked. so rate is good.

the rate is not good when you look at it from larger perspective

[%chance of gold coin] * [%chance of getting enchant hammer] * [%chance of item not breaking] * [%chance of a good rare effect] = very low rate. and this does not even take into account the cost of capes/gemboxes to be used

not only is it low but its boring too. daily job quests for crit for such a low probability (see above)... seems like gm didnt put much thought into this, or maybe he is just a sadist who enjoys anti fun environments

boring and near impossible rates. great combination fun fun fun

[Thomas]

Fun like lvling

[SjokzArmpit]

lvling rates r not that low = =

btw it shouldnt even be called lvling anymore. should be called macroing

[Ampz]

well, will be good if a GM can come here to put some water here