Page 1 of 1

exp stack

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 7:54 pm
by pepex
the suggestion is that if someone is below lv 100 and he reach lv 100 tactic then the exp should not cap only the tactic lv should, giving all the exp back when he cross lv 100.

as an example if i am lv 70 and already have 100 to my main tactic all those 30 lvs till i get to 100 are wasted with this when i get to that lv all that exp is given back.

Re: exp stack

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:33 pm
by pepex
pepex wrote:the suggestion is that if someone is below lv 100 and he reach lv 100 tactic then the exp should not cap only the tactic lv should, giving all the exp back when he cross lv 100.

as an example if i am lv 70 and already have 100 to my main tactic all those 30 lvs till i get to 100 are wasted with this when i get to that lv all that exp is given back.



45 view and not a single reply, not even a troll? :lol:

Re: exp stack

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 1:33 am
by täisdibla
The problem is the exp ratio is different for 1-99 and 100+ (Y)

Re: exp stack

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 3:27 am
by Thomas
pepex wrote:
pepex wrote:the suggestion is that if someone is below lv 100 and he reach lv 100 tactic then the exp should not cap only the tactic lv should, giving all the exp back when he cross lv 100.

as an example if i am lv 70 and already have 100 to my main tactic all those 30 lvs till i get to 100 are wasted with this when i get to that lv all that exp is given back.



45 view and not a single reply, not even a troll? :lol:


Its christmas :)

Re: exp stack

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:19 pm
by pepex
täisdibla wrote:The problem is the exp ratio is different for 1-99 and 100+ (Y)


so once one get to lv 100 exp rates drop to something like 1/2 of 1-99 lvs?

if that is the case stacked exp before is given it can be multiply by 1/2 to compensate.

as an example once i get to 100 tactic on something a secondary exp bar starts filling with the exp and once i get to lv 100 that secondary exp bar gives me 1/2 of the exp acumulated.

Re: exp stack

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:52 am
by HolyHell
idk sounds pretty abusable to me but oks

Re: exp stack

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:52 pm
by Minipp
I don't quite understand the suggestion. Could you explain it a little better using numbers.

My understanding, is that you want to let tactics still able to gain experience after reaching 100 tactics and before you get CC+????

Am I understanding this correctly?

Thanks,
Minipp

Re: exp stack

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:28 pm
by pepex
Minipp wrote:I don't quite understand the suggestion. Could you explain it a little better using numbers.

My understanding, is that you want to let tactics still able to gain experience after reaching 100 tactics and before you get CC+????

Am I understanding this correctly?

Thanks,
Minipp


exp is caped at 100 till one gets to lv 100, problem is that one can get 100 on the main tactic around lv 6x-7x

the suggestion was that a secondary exp bar keep track of all the exp gained once one get to 100 tactic and when the character reach lv 100 that exp will be added.

as someone already say exp rates are diferent that is why all this exp before being added is reduce by 1/2 or what ever is the lv 100+ exp rate.

as a example asuming that 1/2 is the rate of lv 100+ compare to a lv < 100

i have 100 tactic and 1000 exp stored when i reach lv 100 i will receive 500 exp to that tactic.

holyhell wrote:idk sounds pretty abusable to me but oks


how is this abusable?

Re: exp stack

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:39 pm
by Minipp
I see... Sounds like a very interesting idea, but honestly, tactic experience is a lot higher than used to be and that is the reason you are getting 100 tactics so soon.

Why not just 'disable' the cap, and continue adding the experience to your tactics. This is basically what your suggestion means, but instead, at level 100, you are adding it all instantly.

I'm assuming you want to keep the tactic cap based off of level correct? BUT you will be raising the tactic cap from level 1-99 to the same as 100..

Thanks,
Minipp :twisted: