Feralize wrote:'why would someone cast a protection spell, on an enemy'
ss isnt used that much for protection anyways... so far i only see reece hiding constantly under it then ss'ing all the ppl who pierce his ss
Feralize wrote:'why would someone cast a protection spell, on an enemy'
Tensu wrote:Feralize wrote:'why would someone cast a protection spell, on an enemy'
ss isnt used that much for protection anyways... so far i only see reece hiding constantly under it then ss'ing all the ppl who pierce his ss
liranm wrote:for example when you play castel war and you want to prevent archers and thife from multi hit the stone or priest or wiz to cast spells you can ss them then they cant use anything.
and when a wiz cast pro on priest the priest cant use the d2 spell.
Feralize wrote:liranm wrote:for example when you play castel war and you want to prevent archers and thife from multi hit the stone or priest or wiz to cast spells you can ss them then they cant use anything.
and when a wiz cast pro on priest the priest cant use the d2 spell.
If that was the purpose, it would have been a curse spell, not a protection spell.
balzak wrote:i know im being repetitive but why not make then work only in your party when you are not at war and in everyone from same nation that are in war with you? i think most of the "protection" spells should work like that....
balzak wrote:i know im being repetitive but why not make then work only in your party when you are not at war and in everyone from same nation that are in war with you? i think most of the "protection" spells should work like that....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests