Jarlaxle wrote:In war wizards are mainly there to kill people and the warrior to defend while the archer/thief breaks the stone.
Revolt wrote:i voted no and ive played wizard for nearly 9 years now, stones are not ment to be easy to break, if they were war would last 10 mins? lol... This is my view Wizards are for protecting archers and thiefs while the break the stone, priests are ment for supporting and warrior is either for defending our stones due to their slow movement and high dmg/high defence... if you want to break a stone make an archer or thief like i did if not quit crying and find something else to whine about
Revolt wrote:Jarlaxle wrote:In war wizards are mainly there to kill people and the warrior to defend while the archer/thief breaks the stone.
Lol isnt that what i just said ?![]()
Shayne wrote:lul i dun get why grofire wan solo a stone..
Atlantis wrote:relax guys dont take what grofire says to heart. He always plays mages and all he ever does is complain how weak they are and how much they need buffed up. He doesnt realize that each class has their pro's and con's. Just ignore these kind of posts as hes bound to make more.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests