Archers

[täisdibla]

If you could deal 30-40% more damage than a Thief, would you still care about your survivability?
Archer uses "Kamikaze", it's very effective. <--(right now it's not)

I wouldn't ( never did, lol ), but we don't, so... yeah.

[kador]

Comments like these are not needed. Thanks.

Sorry. I couldn't resist.
But Its not a bad way to state Archers sux the way they are right now

[jesse]

I find out this is very funny: everytime a player asks to buff warrior etc, there always will be certain archer players jump out and try to "TEACH" others how to play. But see here, when the topic is about buffing archers, they dont act like pro no more. They seems very humble. This is our DR community, all about bragging and crying, to get what they want and to keep others way.

[täisdibla]

I find out this is very funny: everytime a player asks to buff warrior etc, there always will be certain archer players jump out and try to "TEACH" others how to play. But see here, when the topic is about buffing archers, they dont act like pro no more. They seems very humble. This is our DR community, all about bragging and crying, to get what they want and to keep others way.

Of course. Warriors never needed a buff ( except for leveling, which they already got, 90~93% on Lightning Boom ). Have you seen an unsuccessful warrior yet in this server? All warriors need is the Lightning shock fix and perhaps a buff on Thunder Blow to make grapple more viable and they're fine.

Look at Symtex, he's a D1 warrior and he's basically immortal. Warriors have so many viable choices while as archers have 2: The regular Fire Archer and the build introduced by Thomas, the Darkness Archer ( which hasn't quite caught on yet ).

If you're bored with your balanced class that has many different choices, that's your problem for picking the wrong class. Start a new character. Meanwhile I still have fun with my unbalanced class which has far less choices, yet I want make it balanced.

Have a nice day.

[Toni]

After I met Shark ingame, I stoped to believe that Warrior are lame.

[Thomas]

And he was the person most crying in forums until he discovered there are other combat skills ...just idiotic.
Can rape d4 archer/thief with my d1 warrior 13x tt, nuff said.

[lemonbone]

After I met Shark ingame, I stoped to believe that Warrior are lame.

hahaha

[PuroOsso]

Add white ac to the bow or arrow to give the equivalent AC as a thief's shield or a little less ac

+1
nice one.

[Gaz]

Archers should hit about 20 - 30% more damage than a thief, if this is not the case give them 5% dmg increase and half the white ac of a dragonslayer shield on a d3 bow

[Smarf]

Its would be reasonable if +14 AC for D3 bow, same AC value as D3 double axe, double sword and fence.

no thats total crap, then why not give white AC to whirling staves for priest and mage and more AC to grapple because its damage is kinda low?

A warrior is up close and personal fighter in the 'mmo world' so its normal for them to get more armor from there items.

But an archer is (like I posted before) a glass cannon! its the trade off of playing the EASIEST CLASS in game from 1-99(fact is you can easy solo them levels) that they are not as good as the other classes at mid to end game(also the lower lvl stages of the game archers are OP). If your a archer and you want more AC I'll just tell you GO THIEF! Why did you pick archer if you knew that they have less AC and there game play is the same of a thief? is it because you like fire or something? pff

And YES buff there damage (White damage?) make them hit harder is fine by me but NO freaking AC thats not the 'way of the archer'