The balance of DragonRaja

[Woolich]

i love how you says "look at arabian" for a good archer, while he is REALLY concerded about archer being buffed.

As if, but anyway...

All warriors want warriors to be buffed
All wizards want wizards to be buffed
All archers want archers to be buffed
All priests want priests to be buffed
All thieves want thieves to be buffed

To own, not to balance out the game. Have you ever done maths over thieves and archers before?

(Please re-read your last few posts yourself, i don't see the fact of your argument at all. It's as if you're simply arguing without showing proof of any kind, i dare say you're simply playing around, flaming. In other words, flooding.)
And still calling me a pointless guy...

[Noeyesee]

How can we talk about balancing DR if no one really could test the new dual class change and tt cap.

If we are talking about the old dr, it's easy to says:

Warrior needed a help on tt
Priest needed a good nerf.
Thief were fine.
Archer needed a huge buff.
Mage were fine.

[kador]

But if you nerf some, dont boots others

[Woolich]

How can we talk about balancing DR if no one really could test the new dual class change and tt cap.

If we are talking about the old dr, it's easy to says:

Warrior needed a help on tt
Priest needed a good nerf.
Thief were fine.
Archer needed a huge buff.
Mage were fine.

Warrior owns at higher level. To balance that out, they don't get to level up tt as fast as others.

Kind of agree on priest but not to nerf priest, just to let others up level. Like what the GM team is doing now.

too lazy to type anymore

But if you nerf some, dont boots others

+1