täisdibla wrote:Titus wrote:Why its better from 100 to 140 , than from 0 to 40 . Why isnt linear ?
0->40= from 0% to 13% = from taking 100% damage to taking 87% and it's +13% more survivability from your current state
but 100->140 AC= 33% to 46% reduction = from taking 67% damage to taking 54 and it's +24,1% more survivability from your current state even though the reduction only rises 13%
from 170->210=57% to 70% = from taking 43% damage to taking 30% reduction and it's +44,3% more survivability from your current state even though again the reduction only rises 13%
I think your analisys is not correct:
I will try to explain it :
Damage Recibed(DR) = 1 - AC/300 ( x Damage Enemy)
U Said Survivability(S) = (DR2 - DR1) / DR2
AC2>40
AC2-AC1=40
So S= (1 - AC2/300 - (1 - AC1/300) ) / (1 - AC2/300)
So S= -40 / (AC2 - 300) <------ This formula u use
This is an hiperbola, thats why u said was not linear or exponential.
When AC2 reachs to 300 , S -> to infinite . And Damage -> to cero .
But i think you are making a mistake using the S formula in the analisis. You should use the DR formula, that is simple and linear.