panda wrote:I strongly disagree with this idea...
warrior is already 2X more HP than thief,arhcer ,priest,and 3X more HP than wiz.
if warrior have similar X skill like thief and archer.....
then warrior will be over powered...
warrior advantage is attacking continurity and battle survival rate.
not killer in second .
when in big war, like BM
we all saw how geng the warriories were......
kador wrote:panda wrote:I strongly disagree with this idea...
warrior is already 2X more HP than thief,arhcer ,priest,and 3X more HP than wiz.
if warrior have similar X skill like thief and archer.....
then warrior will be over powered...
warrior advantage is attacking continurity and battle survival rate.
not killer in second .
when in big war, like BM
we all saw how geng the warriories were......
3X HP is a disadvantage here, since everyone has counter set
panda wrote:I strongly disagree with this idea...
warrior is already 2X more HP than thief,arhcer ,priest,and 3X more HP than wiz.
if warrior have similar X skill like thief and archer.....
then warrior will be over powered...
warrior advantage is attacking continurity and battle survival rate.
not killer in second .
when in big war, like BM
we all saw how geng the warriories were......
LegendPro wrote:stop mental charles..![]()
BBJenn wrote:OK, let me tell you... you are so cool
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests